(For example, if rigorous research showed that wide-scale implementation of a particular community-based supervision practice reduced probation revocations, that would be an example of an evidence-based policy. Below are examples of strategies states have used to expand the use of evidence-based programs:Įvidence-based policies refer to broad strategies to reduce youthful offending that have been shown to be effective. Studies have found many of these programs are more effective at reducing recidivism (and cost significantly less) than incarceration.
While evidence-based treatment programs are primarily designed for use in the community instead of institutional settings, most have been adapted for use in both settings.
Below is information detailing many evidence-based reform trends for intervening effectively with youth in trouble with the law.Ĭlick on a topic below for more information:ġ.) Using Evidence-Based Treatment ProgramsĢ.) Using Evidence-Based Policies and Practicesģ.) Evidence-Based Tools for Intervening with YouthĤ.) Effective Implementation of Evidence-Based Practicesĥ.) Ensuring Evidence-Based Practices Work with Diverse YouthĮvidence-based treatment programs, such as various forms of family therapy and cognitive-behavioral interventions, are designed to change a youth’s behavior and are often brand-named (such as Functional Family Therapy and Multi-Systemic Therapy). What works? While it was once erroneously believed that “nothing works” to help youth (and adults) in the justice system, rigorous scientific research has dispelled this myth and demonstrated that there are many juvenile justice programs, policies, and practices that work to reduce recidivism and help youth develop into healthy, productive adults. You Are Here: JJIE Home » Resource Hub » Evidence-Based Practices Section » Reform Trends: Evidence-Based… Reform Trends: Evidence-Based Practices